Intention and Interpretation
Publication: Jan 95
6 x 9
A complete analysis of the postmodern debate on authorial intentionRead the Introduction and an excerpt from Chapter 1 (pdf).
"What is the connection, if any, between the author's intentions in (while) writing a work of literature and the truth (acceptability, validity) of interpretive statements about it?" With this question, Gary Isminger introduces a literary debate that has been waged for the past four decades and is addressed by philosophers and literary theorists in Intention and Interpretation. Thirteen essays discuss the role of appeals to the author's intention in interpreting works of literature. A well-known argument by E.D. Hirsch serves as the basic text, in which he defends the appeal to the author's intention against Wimsatt and Beardsley's claim that such an appeal involved "the intentional fallacy." The essays, mostly commissioned by the editor, explore the presuppositions and consequences of arguing for the importance of the author's intentions in the way Hirsch does. Connections emerge between this issue and many fundamental issues in metaphysics and the philosophy of mind as well as in aesthetics. The (old) "New Criticism" and current Post-Structuralism tend to agree in disenfranchising the author, and many people now are disinclined even to consider the alternative. Hirsch demurs, and arguments like his deserve the careful attention, both from critics and sympathizers, that they receive here. Literary scholars and philosophers who are sympathetic to Continental as well as to Anglo-American styles of philosophy are among the contributors.
"...an excellent and comprehensive discussion of a debate that was initiated in this century in William Wimsatt's and Monroe C. Beardsley's influential article 'The Intentional Fallacy.'...this is a splendidly conceived and very useful collection of essays. Readers will want to take issue with the arguments of individual authors, but this is to be expected in a volume at the cutting edge of a fertile philosophical controversy." —David Novitz, The Philosophical Quarterly
"This is a timely book appearing as it does when postmodernist views of the death of the author are disappearing quickly from the scene. As a collection it exemplifies the best work that is being done on this problem at the moment, and it will no doubt inspire further debate." —The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism
"(T)his volume contains important articles illuminating the central debate over the role and relevance of authorial intentions in literary interoperation." —British Journal of Aesthetics
Table of Contents
Preface Introduction 1. In Defense of the Author – E.D. Hirsch, Jr. 2. The Authority of the Text – Monroe C. Beardsley 3. Robust Relativism – Joseph Margolis 4. The Impossibility of Intentionless Meaning – Steven Knapp and Walter Benn Michaels 5. Interpretation, Intention, and Truth – Richard Schusterman 6. An Intentional Demonstration? – Gary Isminger 7. Art, Intention, and Conversation – Noël Carroll 8. Wittgensteinan Intentions – Colin Lyas 9. Intention and Interpretation: Hirsch and Margolis – Michael Krausz 10. Interpreting with Pragmatist Intentions – Richard Shusterman 11. Irony, Metaphor, and the Problem of Intention – Daniel O. Nathan 12. Allusions and Intentions – Göran Hermerén 13. Intention and Interpretation: A Last Look – Jerrold Levinson Bibliography Notes on Contributors Index of Names